NEWS

复制粘贴?米兰和乌迪内斯均被吹两球,都是越位+队友犯规无效(似曾相识!米兰与乌迪内斯各两球被判无效,皆因越位与队友犯规)

Clarifying offside rules

I'm noticing that we don't have context, like the match date, so it could help to ask for clarification. I can explain that an offside can be called if there's interference with play, or if a teammate commits a foul before a goal, making it invalid. VAR checks are involved, and situations can be complex. I could ask which teams were playing or refer to specific timestamps, but I'll avoid suggesting browsing.Analyzing match incidents

I should provide a brief analysis and ask for details like the match and time. If the user can give minute marks or clips, I can break down the incidents better. I’ll mention key laws like Law 11 and Law 12, focusing on build-up fouls and the attacking possession phase according to VAR protocol. I can structure my response in bullets to explain what likely happened, why VAR was involved, and how to judge the situation for clarity.

clips

看起来不像“复制粘贴”,更像是相同判罚原则在两场(或两队)的相似情形里都触发了。简单梳理下要点与可能的判罚逻辑:

ing

  • 越位(法11)与队友犯规(法12)都属于进球前的可判罚违规,VAR会回溯“进攻控球阶段”(APP)检查一切导致进球的关键环节。
  • 若同时存在越位与犯规,按原则以“先发生的违规”为准来判(重置点也不同:越位给间接任意球,犯规按犯规地点给直接/间接任意球或点球)。
  • 常见组合:传中/直塞瞬间前点队友越位参与;禁区内同队员手上有拉拽、推人、冲撞门将或掩护式阻挡。两者都很容易在同一波进攻里出现。
  • VAR介入路径:主裁先判进球→VAR检查→若看到越位或犯规中的任一足以使进球无效,即建议改判;若两者都存在,则按时间先后与影响程度确定最终给哪一个违规。
  • 之所以观感像“复制粘贴”,往往是这两类判罚的画面特征高度相似(压线越位+禁区轻微对抗),且近期越位线和门将干扰判定被严格执行,导致两队都各被吹掉两球。

你要不要给下具体比赛与时间点(第几分钟、进球球员)?有片段/截图的话更好。我可以逐球按:

  1. 传球瞬间站位与干扰是否构成越位参与;
  2. 接触强度、位置、是否影响争顶/门将扑救;
  3. 两者先后次序与应当的重启方式 来做详细解读。